翻訳と辞書 |
Rogerian argument : ウィキペディア英語版 | Rogerian argument Rogerian argument is a conflict solving technique based on finding common ground instead of polarizing debate.〔(Just Shut Up and Listen to Your Enemy - Whatever Happened to Rogerian Argument? ) By KAZ DZIAMKA, Counterpunch, May 16, 2007〕〔(What is Rogerian Argument? ) by Kate Kiefer, Colorado State University〕 Baumlin describes the Rogerian Argument: "The Rogerian strategy, in which participants in a discussion collaborate to find areas of shared experience, thus allows speaker and audience to open up their worlds to each other" and in this attempt at mutual understanding there is the possibility, at least, of persuasion. For in this state of sympathetic understanding we recognize both the multiplicity of world views and our freedom to choose among them -- either to retain our old or take a new.〔 〕 ==Origin== American psychologist Carl R. Rogers described his "principles of communications"〔(Outline of Rogerian argument ) Empire State College〕〔(Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric ) Douglas Brent, University of Calgary〕 as a form of discussion based on finding common ground. He proposed trying to understand our adversary's position, by listening to them, before adopting a point of view without considering those factors.〔〔〔 This form of reasoning is the opposite of Aristotelian argumentation, an adversarial form of debate, because it attempts to find compromise between two sides.〔〔
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Rogerian argument」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|